Modern Outcomes with Modified PCNL
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with renal calculi ≥ 2 cm as well as larger lower pole calculi [1,2]. The armamentarium of specialized rigid and flexible nephroscopes and powerful lithotripters allow for greater stone-free rates in the treatment of patients with large stone burdens [3]. However, in comparison to shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy, PCNL is associated with greater morbidity, particularly with respect to bleeding risk. This is attributed to the creation of a nephrostomy tract with subsequent tract dilation resulting in shearing of renal parenchyma and bleeding [4]. As such, percutaneous surgery using smaller tracts has been explored as a means to limit the morbidity of PCNL. An assortment of options ranging from micro-, to ultramini-, to miniPCNL have been described [5-7]. Recent series have demonstrated improvements in bleeding risk [8], postoperative pain scores [9] and hospital length of stay [10] compared with standard PCNL. However, despite these benefits, technical limitations apply. Smaller access tracts require miniaturized instruments, precluding the use of many efficient stone fragmentation and retrieval devices routinely used in standard PCNL. Therefore, while reported stone-free rates are generally high, these studies are often limited to patients with stone burdens between 10-20 mm [5,6,8].
منابع مشابه
Modified supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Surgical outcomes from a tertiary teaching hospital
PURPOSE The traditional prone positioning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is associated with various anesthetic and logistic difficulties. We aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of PCNLs performed using our modified supine position with those performed in the standard prone position. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective group of 236 renal units (224 patients) undergoing PCNL were inc...
متن کاملRole of Minimally Invasive (Micro and Ultra-mini) PCNL for Adult Urinary Stone Disease in the Modern Era: Evidence from a Systematic Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of PCNL and the expertise surrounding it has expanded in recent decades. Miniaturisation of equipment and instrument size has formed a part of this innovation. Although an increasing number of studies have been performed on miniaturised PCNL (Mi-PCNL) recently, a critical appraisal on these is lacking. We therefore conducted a systematic review of the literature to ev...
متن کاملUltrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advantages and limitations
PURPOSE The use of ultrasound in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has not been shown to translate to better clinical and stone outcomes. To compare the operative outcomes, postoperative outcomes and complication rates of ultrasound-guided access PCNL (USGA-PCNL) versus fluoroscopy-guided access PCNL (FGA-PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 184 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL fr...
متن کاملAre we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
OBJECTIVE The objective was to demonstrate that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be safely performed with a tubeless or totally tubeless drainage technique. INTRODUCTION Standard PCNL includes nephrostomy tube placement designed to drain the kidney and operative tract at the conclusion of the procedure. Modern technique trend is tubeless PCNL and totally tubeless PCNL, which are perfor...
متن کاملProne versus Modified Supine Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Prospective Randomized Study
OBJECTIVE To perform a prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone and modified supine positions. METHODS Between August 2010 and August 2011, 102 patients with renal calculi and 20 patients with ureteral calculi were randomized to undergo fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided PCNL procedures in the prone or modified supine po...
متن کامل